Inspection is a necessary but non-value-adding activity whose purpose is to protect the customer from poor quality. We should therefore do as little as possible, upon condition that our inspection plan meets the customer’s requirement. Inspection plans with acceptance numbers of zero (c=0) minimize the sample size, albeit at the cost of a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the specified acceptable quality level (AQL).
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
AREA COVERED
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
Speaker Profile
William A. Levinson, P.E., is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt. He is also the author of several books on quality, productivity, and management, of which the most recent is The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work: Henry Ford’s Universal Code for World-Class Success.
Upcoming Webinars
From Challenges to Compliance: Understanding Dietary Supple…
How To Conduct An Internal Harassment And Bullying Investig…
Improving Employee Engagement & Retention Through Stay Inte…
Using Behavior Based Interviewing for Finding the Best Matc…
Leadership: Strategic Planning and Decision Making
The Anti-Kickback Statute: Enforcement and Recent Updates
Do's and Don'ts of Documenting Employee Behaviour, Performa…
De-Stressing Your Leadership for Greater Impact
Emotional Intelligence: Mastering the Emotions of Great Lea…
Bootcamp for New Managers and Supervisors: Avoid These 7 Mi…
How to Conduct Exit Interviews - Implementing and Enhancing…
Coming Soon - New Minimum Salary Levels for Exempt Employee…
Utilizing HR Metrics to Illustrate & Improve Human Resource…
Pivot tables beginner to advanced + 20 advanced Pivot table…
Finance & Accounting 101 Simplified
Understanding How To Write A Compliant CAPAs
Mastering the Candidate Experience in Talent Acquisition.
4-Hour Virtual Seminar on Transformational Leadership - The…
Uplifting the Credibility of HR: How to Build the Credibili…
Treasury Risk Management, Funding, Liquidity, Interest Rate…
Courts No Longer Have to Give Deference to Agency’s “Expert…
21 CFR Part 820 - Quality System Regulation - Applying Prin…
Building Fair Chance Hiring Policies in 2024
HIPAA Bootcamp for Health Care Providers, Professionals, an…
Building GMP Excellence: A Guide to Implementing Compliant …
FDA Technology Modernization Action Plan (TMAP) and Impact …
Weathering the Storm: Navigating Resource Constrained Waters
How to Survive an Emotionally Toxic Workplace
21 CFR Part 11 - Compliance for Electronic Records and Sign…
Excel Power Skills: Master Functions, Formulas, and Macros …
How to Give Corrective Feedback: The CARE Model - Eliminati…
SOPs - How to Write Them to Satisfy those Inspectors
2-Hour Virtual Seminar on the 6 Most Common Problems in FDA…
Understanding the Artificial Intelligence Landscape
Employee Handbook Requirements for 2024. Includes Updated F…
Essential Job Functions According to the American with Disa…
Stay Interviews: A Powerful and Low-Cost Employee Engagemen…
FDA Audit Best Practices - Do's and Don'ts
Engineering Change Management (ECM)
Batch Record Review and Product Release
Workplace Investigations 101: How to Conduct your Investiga…